User Tools

Site Tools


benchmark

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
benchmark [2010/04/04 20:25]
admin
benchmark [2014/01/18 07:44] (current)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 Here we show benchmark comparison of G-language GAE 1.8.11 and BioPerl 1.5.2. Here we show benchmark comparison of G-language GAE 1.8.11 and BioPerl 1.5.2.
 +
 +These benchmarks were done on Dual CPU Intel Core2 Xeon 3GHz (8GB RAM) Machine.
  
 ===== GenBank loading (regular) ===== ===== GenBank loading (regular) =====
Line 34: Line 36:
  
 __**G-language GAE is 32x faster.**__ __**G-language GAE is 32x faster.**__
- 
- 
 ===== GenBank loading (without cache) ===== ===== GenBank loading (without cache) =====
  
Line 62: Line 62:
 <​code>​ <​code>​
 Benchmark: timing 100 iterations of BioPerl, G-language... Benchmark: timing 100 iterations of BioPerl, G-language...
-   ​BioPerl: ​746 wallclock secs (743.09 usr +  2.70 sys = 745.79 CPU) @  0.13/s (n=100) +   ​BioPerl: ​747 wallclock secs (743.60 usr +  2.70 sys = 746.30 CPU) @  0.13/s (n=100) 
-G-language: ​23 wallclock secs (22.31 usr +  0.52 sys = 22.83 CPU) @  ​4.38/s (n=100)+G-language: ​105 wallclock secs (104.07 usr +  0.82 sys = 104.89 CPU) @  ​0.95/s (n=100)
 </​code>​ </​code>​
  
-__**G-language GAE is 32x faster.**__ +__**G-language GAE is 7x faster.**__
benchmark.1270412735.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/01/18 07:44 (external edit)